Nigeria Army chief urges banks to strengthen tracking of terror financing
Nigeria flag waving against clean blue sky, Shutterstock.

Lieutenant General Waidi Shaibu, Nigeria's Chief of Army Staff, called on the country’s banking industry to bolster efforts to detect and report terrorism financing and other illicit financial flows that posed a threat to national security.

ARMY CHIEF’S DEMAND

The appeal by the Chief of Army Staff came as a direct request for financial institutions to strengthen anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism controls, according to a report by Nairametrics Finance.

The statement, carried in domestic media, said the army chief urged banks to deepen transaction monitoring, enhance suspicious activity reporting and improve cooperation with security agencies. The remarks placed greater emphasis on the role of commercial banks, which remain central to formal financial flows in Nigeria.

The call targeted the banking sector’s capacity to identify and escalate complex financial patterns linked to terrorism and other illicit activities, rather than individual banks or a single regulatory action, according to the source.

REGULATORY AND MARKET CONTEXT

Nigeria’s banking sector operates under an established anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulatory framework that requires banks to maintain customer due diligence, transaction monitoring and suspicious activity reporting. Key agencies in the enforcement architecture include the Central Bank of Nigeria, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit, which oversee compliance and intelligence flows between the private sector and state authorities.

Compliance teams at banks typically manage a mix of rule-based and analytics-driven surveillance tools to flag transactions for further review. The army chief’s intervention highlighted ongoing tensions between national security priorities and the operational burdens of compliance, which can affect banks’ costs, staffing and technology investments.

For banks, heightened emphasis on detecting illicit flows increases the need for advanced analytics, cross-border intelligence sharing and closer engagement with law enforcement. These requirements can raise operating costs and demand specialised skills, while also exposing banks to reputational risk if they are perceived to have weak controls.

In markets, stricter scrutiny of transactions and customer relationships can influence correspondent banking access and trade finance arrangements, particularly for banks with significant cross-border activity. International correspondent banks increasingly assess partner banks’ anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing frameworks when deciding on relationships, and public statements by senior security officials can add to that scrutiny.

Financial institutions also balance compliance with customer service, needing to avoid undue friction for legitimate clients while ensuring controls capture sophisticated illicit activity. The army chief’s comments underscored that balance by linking the integrity of financial flows to national security outcomes.

Industry reactions to similar calls in the past have ranged from pledges to invest in compliance technology to requests for clearer guidance from regulators on threat patterns and typologies. Banks generally seek operational clarity from supervisors on expectations for reporting thresholds and inter-agency coordination, which helps them allocate resources effectively.

For regulators, strengthening public-private information exchange channels can amplify detection efforts without imposing blanket obligations that disrupt legitimate economic activity. Collaboration frameworks that allow law enforcement to act on flagged intelligence, while preserving banks’ ability to continue routine services, are central to sustaining both security objectives and financial inclusion goals.

Observers said the army chief’s remarks reaffirmed the security sector’s view that financial intelligence is an essential component of countering terrorism financing. How banks and regulators respond operationally will shape compliance investment plans and the contours of public-private cooperation in the months ahead.

Sources: Nairametrics Finance